I am adding another WIHART gateway (1420) in an area of the plant where I already have one close by . . . so there's a single fiber pair going there from the DeltaV network for connecting the original to the DeltaV Primary / Secondary network.
Rather than install more media converters and consume more ports of our DeltaV switches, I want to install a simple hazardous-area capable switch like this out in the field. As I am using this mainly to allow management of the 1420's through AMS, is their any grave sin in creating a "forked spur" if you will, connecting back to DeltaV? All the wireless I/O will be coming in via Modbus (as is the case with the existing one).
I know DeltaV is fastidious about having a pure "star" network - what do I risk by expanding the network in this way?
Thanks,
John
Andre Dicaire
Gents, Thanks for the quick and thorough advice. I am using "DeltaV Ready" 1420's and they do want to map as wireless IO nodes. I started using Modbus RS485 (serial) back to a DeltaV serial IO port initially for expedience - twisted pair and existing RS485 Modbus were already in the vicinity. So no I am not using the Ethernet for Modbus TCP. I have experimented with the wireless IO which does offer some good features, however I noticed it was consuming one DST per point, and the original project didn't have funding for adding more DST's. Our site does utilize the RM|00 "smart" switches - if I can convert one of the ports to fiber, the VE6019 looks like the ideal solution.
In reply to John Rezabek: