AGA 9 section 7.2.3 (3rd edition from July 2017) is in regards to Field Verification and states:
7.2 Field VerificationThe manufacturer shall provide a field verification test procedure to the operator that will allow the USMto be functionally tested to ensure that the meter is operating properly. These procedures may include acombination of a zero-flow verification test, speed-of-sound measurement analysis, individual pathmeasurement analysis, internal inspection, dimensional verification and other mechanical or electrical tests.1 . The field verification of a USM consists of comparing current meter diagnostic data against initialdiagnostic baseline values or to a prior-known good value to identify possible changes in the USMperformance. It is recommended that field verifications be conducted following commissioning. Thefrequency of verifications should be guided by the meter data history, volume, operating conditions,and/or operator policy.2. Evaluation of any changes to these diagnostic indicators and their potential cause may guide theoperator in determining any impact on the meter performance and the need for any repair, flowperformance test (in-situ or laboratory), adjustment to maintenance interval or design improvement.3. USMs provide serial data that can be collected through end-user polling systems. End-user customalgorithms and commercial data-analysis packages can be utilized to provide real-time continuousevaluation of the USM’ s performance that can help predict maintenance timing.Note: See Appendix E (Informative) for a field verification checklist sample.
Based on your remark, I assume that you are in fact an end user of this USM and not the manufacturer that has to supply calibration data to a customer.
I think it all depends on who or which entity requires compliance with AGA 9 and what you are measuring. So maybe a couple of questions to clarify: 1. What media flow are you measuring with the USM? (Is it really just natural gas?) 2. Is this a custody flow measurement? (If yes, does it supply one or multiple customers?) 3. Is this a measurement due to regulatory or legal requirements? Also, how old is the existing pipe in your plant and what is the internal condition of that pipe? From my experience with USM, the accuracy is highly depended on how well you can replicate the installation and mounting conditions (even if you can assure that the pipe is "exactly" the same and you follow all AGA 9 requirements). Is it possible for you to supply that testing lab with a section of pipe (24" sch60) that is long enough to perform the calibration? If it is really such an important measurement, then you might have a section of that exact same pipe laying around, since it is part of the USM measurement installation. In the end, your company will have to decide if AGA 9 has to be followed exactly for this measurement or not. And if it is a must, then there are really only two options for you: 1. Find a new calibration lab, that can perform the calibration. 2. Work with the existing lab and see if you can supplythe pipe. There might be a third option: Is there any possible way to perform a calibration in the field? (I assume not, but maybe there is a different calibration company that can bring their calibration equipment to your site?)
In reply to martin schlebach:
This is the official online community site of the Emerson Global Users Exchange, a forum for the free exchange of non-proprietary information among the global user community of all Emerson Automation Solution's products and services. Our goal is to improve the efficiency and use of automation systems and solutions employed at members’ facilities by sharing our knowledge, experiences, and application information.
User Groups |
World Areas |
Community Guidelines |
Legal Information |
Contact Community Manager
Website translation provided by
© 2015-2022 Emerson Global Users Exchange. All rights reserved.