I have configured two historical trend windows for the same modules/parameters with quite different results for each. The first trend is a PHV view window of a loop point (PV, SP & OUT) and three valve PVs. In the PHV trend the PVs of the discrete valves are displayed as distinct visible layers. In the other trend window configured with the OLE Embedded Trend Ctrl the same module/parameters were configured with distinctly different results. The PVs of the discrete valves are shown trending on top of one another where finding the true value of a particular PV is impossible. Why are these different?
In reply to PRASHANT-MUTTEPAWAR:
Prashant,
Each parameter trend description can be modified to add clarity and help identify which pen is which parameter (SP, PV or OUT). That does not make the point/parameter different.
Look at the attached jpg. I created the OLE tend (left side) using the Embedded Trend Ctrl with the six pens shown. Notice the 3 discrete device pv overlay each other. Using the right mouse function "Launch Process History View" automatically builds a PHV screen (right side) with the same pens, parameters, colors, descriptors etc. The PHV view looks correct because each discrete is given its own dedicated trend area on the chart.
In reply to putelism: