m

Make Engineer a Protected Title?

In case you haven't seen this Make 'Engineer' a protected title U.K.-based petition, I thought I'd share it to see what thoughts you had. It has spawned a good discussion in the Institute of Measurement and Control LinkedIn Group. Control magazine's editor-in-chief Walt Boyes opines:

The fact is that the automation profession is not strictly speaking an engineering discipline. It is a multidisciplinary skill set with some engineering expertise, some IT expertise, some process expertise, and so forth. ISA recognized this when they set out to create what they call the Certified Automation Professional (CAP). I am aware of several companies whose chief I&C managers are not engineers-- one in particular I know is a mathematician and statistician.

Protecting the title is good, but defining the work is critical. Just because you are an engineer does not mean you know what you are doing in a specialized field like measurement and control, even though your professors at university said so.

For the record, I am not a degreed engineer. I have been an automation professional for nearly 40 years.

What do think about the use of the title of engineer and automation professional?

1 Reply

  • For me personally it seems like building barriers only. At the beginning there is protecting "word" which can use only people who can fulfill any conditions, in teh middle this will be certification process ( of course paid one ) and at the end local recruiters / agencies will be requested this certification in case i.e. you will want to work in UK in process automation industry. This should decrease competition on teh market ( people will be more expancive ) and at the end end user will have to pay more money for project / engineerring work. I am not so friendly with this kind of "separation". It is only way how to reach goals harder for people. I am sure it is my personal point of view......

Related