I came to know that for some critical exothermic reaction where catalyst are involved, they uses Aspen Software for Module process history instead of build in DeltaV Continuous Historian.
what was the reason and capabilities do Aspen have and DeltaV Continuous Historian doesn't?
As if you want close monitoring one can disable the Data Compression in history collection, increase the deviation or change the recording period but after all these good features why they are using other 3rd Party software to capture process history in DeltaV environment?
This is the official online community site of the Emerson Global Users Exchange, a forum for the free exchange of non-proprietary information among the global user community of all Emerson Automation Solution's products and services. Our goal is to improve the efficiency and use of automation systems and solutions employed at members’ facilities by sharing our knowledge, experiences, and application information.
User Groups |
World Areas |
Community Guidelines |
Legal Information |
Contact Community Manager
Website translation provided by
© 2015-2019 Emerson Global Users Exchange. All rights reserved.