Emerson Exchange 365
Search
User
Site
Search
User
State
Verified Answer
Replies
11 replies
Answers
1 answer
Subscribers
5477 subscribers
Views
41368 views
Users
0 members are here
Control
DeltaV #DCS
configuration
PID
Recent DeltaV Community Connect Discussions
Manuel Behrens
18 Mar 2026 10:49 AM
Idea: Splitt the DeltaV Forum
0 Replies
Rune Reppenhagen
17 Mar 2026 12:45 PM
Enhancement ideas: Copper vs. fiber IOPs for the Charm I/O Card (CIOC)
2 Replies
s_brwn
16 Mar 2026 8:22 AM
Auto Logoff DeltaV Operate
2 Replies
Manuel Behrens
4 Mar 2026 1:41 PM
More slots for Chart Builder
0 Replies
DeltaV_User
22 Feb 2026 5:45 PM
Backup Procedure for DeltaV V15 window server 2022 LTSC
1 Reply
<
>
Similar Posts
OUT SCALE of PID Block
Get PID block out of IMAN
Getting out of IMAN mode in PID
Any way to make a PID OUT = IN?
FF AO in Out of Service and PID in IMAN
Share
Answered
Multiplication of PID out with another PID out before passing to AO
Hi,
I have configured a PID control module with AI1 and AO1 for Input and output respectively, let us consider it as PID1.
I Have kept a multiplication block between my PID1 out and AO1's CAS_IN. In the Multiplication Block my PID1 out will be multiplied with another PID blocks output lets say PID2 (PID 2 out scale is 0.95 to 1.05) as per process requirement.
The BKCAL_OUT of AO1 Block is wired to BKCAL_IN of my PID1
In this case if my PID1 generates an output of 20 and my PID 2 output is 100% (ie 1.05 as per out scale) my value at CAS_IN of A01 will be 21,So my PID1 BKCAL_IN will get 21.
Is this configuration correct? Normally PID out and AO blocks BKCAL_OUT will be same so what will happen in this case? Hope you understand what Im trying to do please suggest is there is any better way.
Thanks,
Neeraj S
Control
DeltaV #DCS
configuration
PID
All Responses
Answers Only
gamella
10 Dec 2020 12:31 PM
Ok, thanks.
Not sure because FX3762 function is unknown but I will use a ratio where RATIO is slave of TIC3781 and FX3762 OPUT is wired into RATIO IN_1. Control valve is then slave of ratio block.
IN_1 does not require BKCAL wired so I think this could be best approach as long as FX3762 OUTPUT seems to be a small value that will not require strict bumpless transfer precaution.