Hello All,
Currently, I have a valve that adds water to the process it is a slave to DIC. We are adding an additional valve.
We are running DeltaV 13.3.1
- When FCV01 is at 90% OUT FCV02 starts to open.
I am trying to simulate this and am getting mixed results.
I have taken a random AI (for testing I used an ambient TIT) I have it set up like this.
- AI_OUT > PID IN > PID OUT > SPLTR CAS_IN > SPLTR OUT_1 > AO1; SPLTR OUT_2 > AO2 > AO1 and AO2 go to separate Output Parameter blocks.
- AO1 BKCAL_OUT > SPLTR BKCAL_IN_1; AO2 BKCAL_OUT > SPLTR BKCAL_IN_2; SPLTR BKCAL_OUT > PID BKCAL_IN.
- PID config: Gain 3, Reset and Rate 0; OUT_HI_LIM 200; OUT_SCALE 0-200.
SPLTR config: IN_ARRAY > 1=0, 2=100, 3=90, 4=200. OUT_ARRAY > 1=0, 2=100, 3=0, 4=100.
- AO is default config.
Now when right after I do the download the values seem to go up nicely as expected, SP>PV drives PID OUT up. it eventually gets to 90 and FCV2 begins to open, it gets to 200 and both FCV's are at 100. Now I change SP so SP<PV and things go wrong. In some cases, it immediately PID OUT to ~75 closing FCV2, Other times it may drop it to ~150, which is still a 50% close on FCV2, and still other times it drops PID OUT to 0. Now this becomes the case if I set the SP>PV again it will immediately jump up to 80% from 0 and I have seen it go to 200%.
I think the longer I leave it alone after reaching 0 or 200 the more stability from a change (though it still jumps by 50%).
The AI (TIT) is sitting at 4.7C, no bad status, but it's definitely not that cold.
When SP < PV I usually set SP at 2, when SP > PV I set SP to 10.
Some reading I have done seems to suggest that it could be the BKCAL_OUT of AO1 does not move and because BKCAL_OUT2 of AO2 moves and AO1 doesn't the upstream blocks use the value of AO2 which creates the undesired result. However, I feel like this should work. I would love to test this with the actual valves, but it is a critical loop and will only have access to it during a shutdown next month.
If anyone can help me out or explain what's happening, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks,
Michael