I'm having a lot of confusion surrounding DeltaV Time Sync with relation to SOE cards. I have the current architecture:
1.) DV network with 2 controllers and ProPLUS each with 1 SOE card attached to them.
2.) GPS based NTP time server ON A REMOTE NETWORK (i.e not connected to the ACN)
In this case, the PPLUS syncs with the NTP time server. My question is related to the "DeltaV Network Time Synchronization" white paper. It states the following:
The time synchronization accuracy for workstations, using 100Mbps ethernet, can be expected to be ±10ms in this configuration. For DeltaV embedded nodes, the accuracy will be ±1ms (older DeltaV controllers running at 10Mbps are able to achieve ±10ms accuracy). These accuracies can be achieved only when the Stratum 1 time server is directly connected to the DeltaV ACN.
Question #1: Related to the stated accuracy of +/-1ms when the time server is on the ACN, what is the accuracy when it is remote? Do you really gain anything by using a remote time server?
The "DeltaV Sequence of Events" white paper states the following:
Because SOE messages require more accurate synchronization, an NTP server that uses a standardized reference time - such as Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) – is used. In this confguration, the reference time is typically communicated to the NTP server in the DeltaV network using a radio or satellite receiver (eg. Global Positioning System—GPS) or modem. NTP servers that utilize this method are referred to as stratum 1 NTP servers and provide the highest level of accuracy. These servers are capable of providing time synchronization accuracy of +/- 1ms for controllers and of +/- 10ms for workstations. If SOE input cards are present in the DeltaV network and the synchronization between controllers is less than +/- 1ms, the controllers will generate events indicating that they are out of sync with one another.
Question #2: This last statement indicates that there will be errors is time sync accuracy is greater than +/-1 ms, but the Time Sync white paper states that you can only achieve down to +/-1ms. Can someone resolve these two (apparently) conflicting statements for me?
In reply to Alex Lutz:
In reply to Alexandre Peixoto:
Sal Salamone
In reply to Sal Salamone: