<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Balancing the CAPEX and OPEX Sides of Corrosion Monitoring and Control</title><link>/industries/refining/b/weblog/posts/balancing-the-capex-and-opex-sides-of-corrosion-monitoring-and-control-1048621413</link><description>In a Hydrocarbon Engineering article, Emerson’s Jake Davies looks at corrosion monitoring from a cost/benefit standpoint. 
 Imagine this situation, which probably won’t require too much effort to visualize. You have an eight-year-old car, and looking</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>