<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Case Study: How a U.S. Water Authority Significantly Reduced Secondary Treatment Costs</title><link>/industries/otherindustries/water-wastewater/b/weblog/posts/case-study-how-a-u-s-water-authority-significantly-reduced-secondary-treatment-costs-1958151738</link><description>Manually controlling water and wastewater treatment processes — such as those performed by aeration basins — typically creates significant operational variations that translate into reduce efficiency, higher costs and lower performance. Automation offers</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>