<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Combustion, Gas and Liquid Analysis, Flame &amp;amp; Gas Detection - Recent Threads</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:26:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions" /><item><title>GC 370 XA can't start and there is information on the screen "Rebooting system due no found to connected database"</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/11256?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:26:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:29c2ca40-920c-44ce-a4e4-fc9fa05de72f</guid><dc:creator>Hadi Familiyanto</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/11256?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/11256/gc-370-xa-can-t-start-and-there-is-information-on-the-screen-rebooting-system-due-no-found-to-connected-database/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;pre id="tw-target-text" class="tw-data-text tw-text-large tw-ta" dir="ltr" data-placeholder="Translation" data-ved="2ahUKEwiAwc6tjvCMAxVTR2wGHb4WMNMQ3ewLegQICBAV"&gt;&lt;span class="Y2IQFc" lang="en"&gt;Dear Sir

We would like to ask about the GC 370 XA not working and the screen says Rebooting system due to no found to connected database, what is the problem with this GC?

Please help and support solving this problem&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description></item><item><title>Repeatibility and Linearity in 5081-A Transmitter</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/10767?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 22:42:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:73e9879c-e75d-47ca-bb0d-a21aa77b9222</guid><dc:creator>farzan</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/10767?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/10767/repeatibility-and-linearity-in-5081-a-transmitter/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I want to use 5081-A Transmitter along with 499ATrDO Dissolved oxygen sensor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our required calibrated range is 0-20 ppb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the transmitter 5081 datasheet (LIQ_PDS_5081/Rev.R Page#6) under the heading of General Specifications for 5081-A, it is defined as following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Repeatibility (Input) = 0.1% of range&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Linearity (input)= 0.3% of range&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and above some input ranges are given in current units.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now, we know that the sensor 499ATrDO has the range of 0.1 to 20 ppm (i.e. 20,000 ppb), so does it meant that the repeatability of the transmitter will be 0.1% of 20,000 ppb? and similarly linearity will be 0.3% of 20,000 ppb? This will result in a very high values for repeatability and linearity as our working range is only 20 ppb. Can you please explain this doubt?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Repeatibility and Linearity in 5081-A Transmitter</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23532?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 01:58:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:2138af6f-01d7-47aa-8ae6-f9644862cc30</guid><dc:creator>farzan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23532?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/10767/repeatibility-and-linearity-in-5081-a-transmitter/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>HI Jacalyn&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What i understand that we need to consider the repeatability and linearity of transmitter and sensor both. in this case, if your point is take that Repeatibility is 0.1% of Range (which is 20,000 ppb) then the value comes out to be 20 ppb which is an extremely high value for a calibrated span of 20 ppb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest that the customer should consider this much error in the reading if he keeps the span to 0 to 20 ppb?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Repeatibility and Linearity in 5081-A Transmitter</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23531?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 21:31:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:b8c6a484-68be-413f-83fa-85be492dc832</guid><dc:creator>Jacalyn Saint Rudolph</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23531?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/10767/repeatibility-and-linearity-in-5081-a-transmitter/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>The 499ATRDO sensor PDS dated 2019 has the following specifications (see pages 3-4):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rosemount 499ATrDO (emerson.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The repeatability is 2% of reading at constant temp, and linearity is either 5% of reading or 3ppb, whichever is greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 5081-A PDS, to the best of my understanding, refers to the full range.  So even if you say you will calibrate to 20 ppb, it is declared as 0.1% of the transmitter range. Furthermore, it seems to have been written such that it applies to any amperometric sensor, whereas the specifications above is intended specifically for 499ATRDO.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Use of Flame Simulator Model: FS-IR-975 and FS-HR-975</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23072?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 14:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:2ddda557-ebef-4217-b979-892942b31874</guid><dc:creator>Brenna Roseth</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/23072?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/10458/use-of-flame-simulator-model-fs-ir-975-and-fs-hr-975/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>While it is possible to have the FS-HR-975 carry out both scenarios for the 975HR and 975MR, it is only made to work within specification for the 975HR. The 975MR will likely still detect the simulator for the HR, but distances, ranges, sensitivities, etc. will not line up and may not work as expected. It is recommended to use the appropriate flame simulator for the corresponding detector for best performance.&lt;br /&gt;
- Kevin Stultz, Global Product Manager&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Use of Flame Simulator Model: FS-IR-975 and FS-HR-975</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/10458?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:46:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:1edf6459-f5b3-49fd-8987-141ccdef96c8</guid><dc:creator>Rodrigo Sandoval</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/10458?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/10458/use-of-flame-simulator-model-fs-ir-975-and-fs-hr-975/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Experts&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flame Detector 975MR has a range of&amp;nbsp;4&amp;mu;m and 5&amp;mu;m to detect hydrocarbon-based fuel and gas fires&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flame Detector 975HR has a range of&amp;nbsp;2&amp;mu;m and 5&amp;mu;m to detect hydrogen fires&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to have in stock just one flame simulator I want to acquire the Flame simulator model FS-HR-975 where according with the spectrum range is able to simulate Methane and Hydrogen spectrum.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder if it&amp;#39;s possible with &lt;span&gt;one flame simulator&amp;nbsp;FS-HR-975 carry out both scenarios?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I look forward to your advice and comments&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best regards&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rosemount™︎ 3300HTVP PERpH-X™︎ High Performance pH and ORP Sensor</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9905?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 08:43:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:487ea5f1-7e58-480d-b65a-e3d54491243a</guid><dc:creator>Ahamed farid</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9905?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9905/rosemount-3300htvp-perph-x-high-performance-ph-and-orp-sensor/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dears,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We use 3300HTVP pH to neutralize inclinator waste acidic liquids. Sensor is mounted directly to the process. There is no option for effluent disposal. The sensor is get damaged very frequently typically one or two weeks. I&amp;nbsp;doubt some small particulates damaging the glass electrode. Operation maintain high flow for mixing chemicals. They are expecting pH reading with no lag. Kindly give a solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9869?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 23:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:20e9538e-c68c-4bf4-8ec3-ca52c370cfc1</guid><dc:creator>brian remley</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9869?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone has noise issues at flow rates coming from the conditioning plate or orifice fitting?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22125?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 23:10:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:25104e9b-304f-40a7-b07f-88af1fdcef90</guid><dc:creator>brian remley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22125?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Martin, so I looked up the Profiler but the information i see says &amp;quot;obsolete&amp;quot;, I don&amp;#39;t see anything for a replacement. I understand Daniel has or is changing ownership, not sure if this is now part of the problem. Do you have recommendations for a replacement?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22112?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:00:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:c8876283-b4d3-4d90-ab12-0a495fba09c4</guid><dc:creator>brian remley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22112?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Thank you for this information&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22109?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:43:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:fbbda625-e695-4a60-8ff4-71f6caa467bd</guid><dc:creator>martin schlebach</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22109?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Initially flow conditioning plates did not have the holes beveled which caused the gas to collapse behind the plate causeing noise at certain velocities.  For the Daniel Profiler this as the standard for Orifice runs as it was thought that the noise wouldn&amp;#39;t interfere with the measurement as it would with USMs.  However the noise levels far exceeded the OSHA levels and as such all FCs had their holes beveled on the downstream as a minimum.  CPA also found the same issues with their 50E and beveled the inlet and outlet of each hole as a standard.  The plates will still generate some noise but the levels are below the 80 dB levels.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22106?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:41:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:77e0b674-fb14-4e23-b1fe-fbada772f015</guid><dc:creator>John Stephens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22106?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Definitely at high flow rates. I don&amp;#39;t usually get too concerned with the noise unless it has an &amp;quot;odd&amp;quot; tone or the noise level increases and flow rates have not significantly changed. These usually mean that something is caught in the flow conditioner and a tube inspection is needed.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Daniel Senior Fitting with Profiler plate</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22104?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:29:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:dd56c147-2271-4253-9cc3-fbad5403b68f</guid><dc:creator>martin schlebach</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/22104?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9869/daniel-senior-fitting-with-profiler-plate/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>a flow conditioning plate will generate noise if the holes are not chamfered, for orifice meters the Daniel Profiler was not initially chamfered since any noise created would not effect measurement.  However as you have found out it&amp;#39;s very annoying and the processes were changed to include breaking the edges of the downstream potion of the holes.  Even with the chamferring there can be some noise generated at certain velocities.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: P/N clarification for PCA MAIN CPU for 700XA GC</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21659?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:44:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:1c1e3240-6024-4548-8478-2860c6d5fb54</guid><dc:creator>Nishant Thankappan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21659?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9658/p-n-clarification-for-pca-main-cpu-for-700xa-gc/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /&gt;
&lt;meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)" /&gt;
&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;


&lt;div class="WordSection1"&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;Dear Otabek,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;Please note that the part is interchangeable.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="771" style="width:578.2pt;margin-left:-.05pt;border-collapse:collapse;"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr style="height:10.2pt;"&gt;
&lt;td width="94" nowrap="" style="width:70.4pt;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-left:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-bottom:none;border-right:none;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;height:10.2pt;"&gt;
&lt;div class="" style="text-indent:8.0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;"&gt;2-3-0710-007&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td width="677" nowrap="" style="width:507.8pt;border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.0pt;background:#EEEEEE;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;height:10.2pt;"&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:black;"&gt;Replaced by 7A00055G02 - XA CPU Board&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;Best regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;Nishant&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:#7F7F7F;"&gt;Nishant Thankappan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:#7F7F7F;"&gt; | BDM – Analyzer Solutions &amp;amp; Detection&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang="NL" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:#7F7F7F;"&gt;Emerson Automation Solutions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span lang="NL" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:#7F7F7F;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;PO Box 17033&amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Dubai
 &amp;nbsp;|&amp;nbsp;United Arab Emirates &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span lang="NL" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:#7F7F7F;"&gt;T +971&amp;nbsp;4 811 8363&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; F +971 4 886 5465&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp; M +971 529123807&amp;nbsp; |&amp;nbsp;
&lt;a href="mailto:Nishant.Thankappan@Emerson.com"&gt;&lt;u&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0563C1;border:none;"&gt;&lt;span style="border:none;"&gt;Nishant.Thankappan@Emerson.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,sans-serif;color:black;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=""&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10.0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>P/N clarification for PCA MAIN CPU for 700XA GC</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9658?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:19:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:7eb3fa1d-4e65-4dee-9939-89e846e2e3b7</guid><dc:creator>Otabek N. Fayzullaev</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9658?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9658/p-n-clarification-for-pca-main-cpu-for-700xa-gc/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Sir,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pls. confirm the part number interchangeability of PCA MAIN CPU for 700XA GC: &amp;quot;2-3-0710-007&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;7A00555G02&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Otabek N. Fayzullaev&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Gas chromatography daniel 500</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9581?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:21:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:9789ee20-0e86-4424-a193-f4d2c164bfeb</guid><dc:creator>Mohammed .M</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9581?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9581/gas-chromatography-daniel-500/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;h3 class="name"&gt;&lt;span&gt;as chromatography&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;div class="content"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear all&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;we had issue&amp;nbsp; regarding the Daniel&amp;reg; Danalyzer&lt;span class="emoticon ui-tip" title="Tm"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Model 500. Gas Chromatograph.&amp;nbsp; failure C6 hexan,C2 please note the below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;While&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;we are facing issue with GC 500 (Error and Range out of limit in and&amp;nbsp;deviation RF alarm&amp;nbsp; Hexane, Ethane , Propane is showing Zero). What the step to solve this Issue&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;So kindly support to fix this issue .&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Gas chromatography daniel 500</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21466?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:cc53aade-6ec4-4465-82be-443071ded81d</guid><dc:creator>Khadra Helminski</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21466?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9581/gas-chromatography-daniel-500/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Hi Mohammed,&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for contacting us. To troubleshoot the problem, our application support engineers may need more information about the analyzer. Please send a request to our support team at GC.CSC@Emerson.com and they will advise on the next steps to solve the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
best regards,&lt;br /&gt;
Khadra&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21215?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:51:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:3ac68067-dedd-4432-ad14-3ba458b68ae8</guid><dc:creator>jamie marsden</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21215?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello Zazar, Please confirm what you mean by PID loop? Is this with regard to a Modbus function in our software?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9425?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:06:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:baa5d314-aed9-48d5-9abb-1a241b8e8f81</guid><dc:creator>Shaiq Bashir</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9425?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Emerson Support&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have one 700XA Gas Chromatograph on which some of the boolean status are configured on Modbus Coil addressss (10000-19999). Some of the boolean status are as following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No Sample Flow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analyzer Failure&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Low Carrier Pressure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The flow computer that we have interfaced with this chromatograph supports only Holding Registers (40000-49999). Is it possible to change such status signals in Gas Chromatograph modbus map to Holding Registers?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21208?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 12:11:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:21a25f33-71f6-42c1-97fb-7a5d8f94490a</guid><dc:creator>zazar</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21208?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;div dir="ltr"&gt;hello you tell me how create pid loop&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21067?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:56:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:f659d4b9-a047-4110-9888-c7a508ff48f4</guid><dc:creator>jamie marsden</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21067?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Great, Thank you for confirming.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21066?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:33:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:2bab83cd-57e1-4988-a5ce-30930a15035c</guid><dc:creator>Shaiq Bashir</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21066?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Thanks Jamie, it did the job.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Converting Emerson 700XA Gas Chromatograph Status Signals to Modbus Holding Registers</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21034?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:36:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:114212b4-3aca-4399-8f29-fc6a4b5eb29f</guid><dc:creator>jamie marsden</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/21034?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9425/converting-emerson-700xa-gas-chromatograph-status-signals-to-modbus-holding-registers/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello Shaiq Bashir,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can be done by changing the data type in the Modbus map from Boolean to Int , or create a new register of type int at an unused register address.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: gas chromatography</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/20730?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 07:53:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:6437355f-3f1f-413f-a5a8-284a064b4794</guid><dc:creator>Nishant Thankappan</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/20730?ContentTypeID=1</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9269/gas-chromatography/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello Mohammed, please send send me an email with your contact details (nishant.thankappan@emerson.com) and we will reach out to you to understand the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
Will it be possible to share the sample and calibration CGM and report to see the peak separations and RF?&lt;br /&gt;
We also need GC configuration file to see the Time events etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks and regards,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nishant Thankappan&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>gas chromatography</title><link>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9269?ContentTypeID=0</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:15:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cd40bb2b-3d49-4868-939d-417119b40291:af9c6d27-561c-4859-b314-040d85810921</guid><dc:creator>Mohammed .M</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>https://emersonexchange365.com/thread/9269?ContentTypeID=0</comments><wfw:commentRss>https://emersonexchange365.com/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/f/analytical-discussions-questions/9269/gas-chromatography/rss?ContentTypeId=0</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear all&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;we had issue&amp;nbsp; regarding the Daniel&amp;reg; Danalyzer[emoticon:7d377b609b6f44bf9290e3d8a0b9a733]&amp;nbsp;Model 500. Gas Chromatograph.&amp;nbsp; failure C6 hexan, please note the below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Observed GC&amp;nbsp; Hexane issue showing 0 value. While troubleshooting when it is calibrating from calibration gas Hexane value coming exactly 0.2 % alarm not coming. When it is keeping through Sample line Hexane value going to zero value again alarm giving in DCS and SVR also Hexane low value. Remaining all gas composition are coming exactly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So could you please advise form emrson or roemont&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>