<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Selecting a safety-critical level instrument using undetected (DU) failure rates</title><link>/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/b/level-weblog/posts/selecting-a-safety-critical-level-instrument-using-undetected-du-failure-rates</link><description>Dangerous undetected (DU) failure rates are often considered more relevant than safe failure fraction as a basis for selecting a safety-critical instrument. The latest vibrating fork level switches from Emerson have been designed with enhanced diagnostics</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>