<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Annubar Averaging Pitot Tube Flow Measurement&amp;#160;Advancements</title><link>/community-hubs/measurement-instrumentation/b/flow_weblog/posts/annubar-averaging-pitot-tube-flow-measurement-160-advancements</link><description>The ways to measure gas and liquid flow are numerous. In prior posts, we’ve highlighted Annubar technology, which is similar to pitot tube technology. From Wikipedia: The biggest difference between an annubar and a pitot tube is that an annubar takes</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>