<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://emersonexchange365.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Continuous Condition Monitoring Cuts Costs</title><link>/community-hubs/asset-management/b/asset-management-weblog/posts/continuous-condition-monitoring-cuts-costs</link><description>In an article in the AFPM Summit Conference News, Emerson’s Jacob Swafford makes the case for continuous versus intermittent condition monitoring. 
 I don’t think I have ever met a maintenance manager who said that condition monitoring is a waste of time</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>